Ask once. Read Claude, Gemini and GPT side by side. Branch a follow-up from whichever answer earns it.
We're a 3-person team launching a paid B2B tool. Charge from day one, or start free? Give one recommendation and the strongest argument against it.
Recommendation: Charge from day one. As a 3-person team, your most constrained resource is time. Charging immediately provides true validation of your product-market fit (people saying they like it vs. people actually opening their wallets) and protects you from drowning in support tickets and feature requests from free users who will never convert. The Strongest…
We're a 3-person team launching a paid B2B tool. Charge from day one, or start free? Give one recommendation and the strongest argument against it.
Recommendation: Charge from day one. For a 3-person B2B team, payment is the cleanest signal you'll get. Free users tell you what they like. Paying users tell you what they need. When someone has to get budget approval, even for $50/month, they reveal whether your tool solves a real, prioritized problem or is just "interesting." It also protects your scarcest resource…
We're a 3-person team launching a paid B2B tool. Charge from day one, or start free? Give one recommendation and the strongest argument against it.
Recommendation: Charge from day one (no free tier), but offer a short, human-assisted pilot. Price early—even if it’s “early access” pricing—and sell to a narrow ICP with a clear use case. For a 3-person B2B team, this forces focus on a painful, budgeted problem, filters out low-intent users, and gives you the only signal that really matters: someone will pay to make this…
Follow-up under claude-opus-5.5
What would change your mind?
Several specific facts would flip my recommendation to starting free, or at least to a free tier. About your product • Value scales with users inside an account. If one person using it alone gets little benefit and the payoff comes when their teammates join, a paywall blocks the spread that makes the product worth buying. • It needs…
Follow-up under claude-opus-5.5
Draft the pricing page headline
Recommended: Simple pricing. Real results in 14 days, or your money back. It leads with clarity, puts the risk-reversal (trial plus guarantee) right in the headline, and signals that you charge without making price the first thing a buyer sees. Alternatives, depending on your angle: • Value-led: "Pays for itself in [X weeks]. Or…
Recorded Oct 13, 2026 · Real model answers, shortened to fit the cards
The models you would open three tabs for are all here.
Send one question to several models. Each answer lands on the canvas as its own node.
Read the answers next to each other and see where the models agree, and where they do not.
Follow up under any node. Every fork stays visible instead of scrolling away in chat history.
Public canvases you can open and read, node by node.
Same question answered side-by-side by Claude Opus 5.5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and GPT-6.1 Sol, with two follow-ups under Claude. Recorded 2026-10-13.
5 nodesCompare how GPT, Claude, and Gemini explain resistant starch benefits, then branch into buying supplements vs cooking tricks.
7 nodesBuy credits once, spend them as you ask. Bigger models and longer context use more credits.
Try every model on a few real questions.
For regular comparisons and branching follow-ups.
For long research canvases with deep context.
One credit balance works across every model. Each AI card shows the credits it used.
Credits are Nody's prepaid unit. Each AI answer spends credits based on the model you pick and how much context it reads. One balance covers every model.
No. Credit packs are one-time purchases. Buy another pack when you run low.
Models from Anthropic, Google and OpenAI (Claude, Gemini and GPT) on the same canvas. Pick a model per question.
Every AI card shows the credits it used.
Put Claude, Gemini and GPT on one canvas, on one shared credit balance.
Start your first canvas